+149.9%
DINO vs MSTZ
-99.1%
+249.0%
-44.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 10y.
| Period | Portfolio | MSTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.4% | +6.6% | -7.0% | -0.2% |
| 7D | +1.5% | +24.8% | -23.3% | +2.3% |
| 30D | +25.9% | -59.2% | +85.1% | +22.6% |
| 3M | +53.2% | -56.9% | +110.0% | +50.6% |
| 6M | +105.5% | -57.6% | +163.0% | +103.5% |
| YTD | +139.2% | -73.6% | +212.8% | +137.1% |
| 1Y | +117.4% | -15.6% | +132.9% | +129.0% |
| All | +149.9% | -99.1% | +249.0% | +143.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MSTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MSTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MSTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 10y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MSTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
10y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling