-22.6%
CLX vs HTZ
-94.4%
+71.8%
-49.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | HTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.2% | -2.6% | +3.8% | +1.2% |
| 7D | +9.5% | -8.5% | +18.0% | +9.7% |
| 30D | +30.7% | -18.9% | +49.6% | +31.1% |
| 3M | +4.2% | -36.0% | +40.3% | +4.9% |
| 6M | +22.1% | -74.6% | +96.7% | +24.5% |
| YTD | +14.1% | -70.8% | +84.9% | +15.8% |
| 1Y | +10.3% | -75.3% | +85.6% | +12.3% |
| 3Y | -7.8% | -81.6% | +73.8% | -5.7% |
| All | -22.6% | -94.4% | +71.8% | -19.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling