+6.9%
CLX vs HTZ
-73.6%
+80.5%
-35.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | HTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.2% | +9.3% | -9.1% | +0.1% |
| 7D | +7.8% | -27.4% | +35.2% | +8.3% |
| 30D | +28.5% | -11.4% | +39.9% | +28.8% |
| 3M | +1.3% | -33.1% | +34.4% | +1.6% |
| 6M | +23.4% | -73.5% | +96.9% | +26.3% |
| YTD | +11.4% | -68.1% | +79.5% | +13.7% |
| 1Y | +6.9% | -74.3% | +81.2% | +12.9% |
| All | +6.9% | -73.6% | +80.5% | +12.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling