-1.4%
CLX vs HTZ
-73.0%
+71.6%
-35.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | HTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.5% | -20.8% | +21.3% | +1.0% |
| 7D | +12.4% | -7.7% | +20.2% | +12.6% |
| 30D | +21.1% | -13.1% | +34.2% | +21.4% |
| 3M | -3.3% | +14.7% | -18.1% | -3.7% |
| 6M | +18.8% | -70.6% | +89.4% | +21.7% |
| YTD | +3.9% | -65.2% | +69.1% | +5.9% |
| All | -1.4% | -73.0% | +71.6% | +4.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling