-32.0%
CLX vs HTZ
-86.4%
+54.5%
-46.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | HTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.3% | +1.3% | -2.6% | -1.3% |
| 7D | -9.2% | +7.5% | -16.7% | -9.4% |
| 30D | -11.0% | +47.4% | -58.5% | -11.9% |
| 3M | +5.0% | -54.9% | +59.9% | +6.2% |
| 6M | -18.8% | -47.0% | +28.2% | -18.3% |
| YTD | -4.4% | -55.3% | +50.8% | -3.4% |
| 1Y | -21.9% | -57.6% | +35.8% | -21.1% |
| All | -32.0% | -86.4% | +54.5% | -25.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling