-50.0%
CLSK vs NIO
-52.4%
+2.4%
-69.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.8% | -4.9% | +2.1% | -0.4% |
| 7D | +8.0% | -14.5% | +22.4% | +16.5% |
| 30D | -27.9% | -15.0% | -13.0% | -21.8% |
| 3M | -42.3% | -35.6% | -6.7% | -30.5% |
| 6M | -50.0% | -55.7% | +5.7% | -29.9% |
| All | -50.0% | -52.4% | +2.4% | -29.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling