+27.6%
CLSK vs NIO
-37.6%
+65.2%
-64.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.6% | -3.2% | -0.4% | -2.5% |
| 7D | +1.7% | -7.3% | +9.0% | +4.5% |
| 30D | +11.1% | -22.5% | +33.6% | +21.3% |
| 3M | -14.1% | -30.9% | +16.8% | -2.4% |
| 6M | +32.9% | -37.2% | +70.1% | +53.2% |
| YTD | +26.5% | -29.8% | +56.3% | +39.4% |
| 1Y | +27.6% | -37.4% | +65.0% | +61.0% |
| All | +27.6% | -37.6% | +65.2% | +61.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling