+221.7%
CLSK vs NIO
-63.5%
+285.2%
-71.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +6.2% | -0.3% | +6.5% | +6.3% |
| 7D | +21.9% | -6.7% | +28.5% | +24.6% |
| 30D | +9.6% | -20.0% | +29.6% | +17.7% |
| 3M | -18.4% | -30.5% | +12.1% | -8.2% |
| 6M | +46.4% | -20.7% | +67.1% | +54.9% |
| YTD | +33.2% | -25.7% | +58.9% | +43.4% |
| 1Y | +47.0% | -38.6% | +85.6% | +66.9% |
| All | +221.7% | -63.5% | +285.2% | +299.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling