+284.5%
BLDR vs NIO
-36.7%
+321.2%
-70.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.5% | -1.6% | +4.1% | +2.7% |
| 7D | -2.8% | -13.0% | +10.2% | -1.3% |
| 30D | -13.3% | -18.3% | +5.0% | -11.3% |
| 3M | -12.3% | -33.2% | +21.0% | -8.4% |
| 6M | -31.5% | -21.5% | -10.0% | -30.2% |
| YTD | -36.1% | -25.5% | -10.6% | -34.6% |
| 1Y | -54.1% | -38.0% | -16.1% | -52.4% |
| 3Y | -55.8% | -65.5% | +9.7% | -53.1% |
| 5Y | +20.7% | -90.6% | +111.3% | +37.3% |
| All | +284.5% | -36.7% | +321.2% | +256.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling