-57.7%
BLDR vs NIO
-37.4%
-20.3%
-57.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.9% | -0.3% | -4.6% | -4.9% |
| 7D | -0.3% | -6.7% | +6.3% | -0.2% |
| 30D | -16.2% | -20.0% | +3.8% | -16.0% |
| 3M | -14.4% | -30.5% | +16.0% | -13.8% |
| 6M | -32.8% | -20.7% | -12.1% | -32.1% |
| YTD | -39.2% | -25.7% | -13.5% | -38.6% |
| 1Y | -57.7% | -38.6% | -19.1% | -56.5% |
| All | -57.7% | -37.4% | -20.3% | -56.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling