-41.4%
BLDR vs NIO
-50.3%
+8.9%
-60.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.9% | -1.2% | +0.3% | -0.9% |
| 7D | -10.3% | -1.8% | -8.5% | -10.2% |
| 30D | +19.6% | -6.6% | +26.2% | +19.9% |
| 3M | -17.0% | -29.9% | +12.9% | -16.2% |
| 6M | -16.7% | -46.6% | +29.9% | -15.0% |
| YTD | -39.4% | -36.5% | -2.9% | -38.1% |
| All | -41.4% | -50.3% | +8.9% | -40.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling