-6.4%
BLDR vs NIO
-92.1%
+85.6%
-76.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.5% | +5.9% | -10.5% | -5.5% |
| 7D | -3.7% | +5.6% | -9.3% | -4.5% |
| 30D | +16.8% | -4.2% | +21.0% | +17.5% |
| 3M | -13.7% | -26.3% | +12.6% | -9.6% |
| 6M | -21.9% | -42.5% | +20.7% | -15.1% |
| YTD | -39.2% | -33.5% | -5.7% | -36.2% |
| 1Y | -42.6% | -52.7% | +10.0% | -36.3% |
| 3Y | -50.2% | -57.5% | +7.3% | -47.5% |
| All | -6.4% | -92.1% | +85.6% | +21.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling