-54.1%
BLDR vs NIO
-37.4%
-16.7%
-57.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.5% | -1.6% | +4.1% | +2.5% |
| 7D | -2.8% | -13.0% | +10.2% | -2.7% |
| 30D | -13.3% | -18.3% | +5.0% | -13.2% |
| 3M | -12.3% | -33.2% | +21.0% | -11.7% |
| 6M | -31.5% | -21.5% | -10.0% | -30.8% |
| YTD | -36.1% | -25.5% | -10.6% | -35.5% |
| 1Y | -54.1% | -38.0% | -16.1% | -52.7% |
| All | -54.1% | -37.4% | -16.7% | -52.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling