+100.1%
ANET vs GLXY
+7.0%
+93.1%
-28.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | GLXY | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.0% | -7.0% | +6.0% | +0.4% |
| 7D | +3.7% | +4.5% | -0.9% | +2.6% |
| 30D | +0.7% | +28.8% | -28.1% | -4.8% |
| 3M | +26.8% | -23.0% | +49.8% | +31.2% |
| 6M | +40.7% | +17.0% | +23.6% | +31.4% |
| YTD | +47.2% | +12.5% | +34.8% | +35.2% |
| 1Y | +36.0% | -5.4% | +41.3% | +27.3% |
| All | +100.1% | +7.0% | +93.1% | +76.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLXY.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLXY return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLXY return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLXY wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling