+107.0%
ANET vs GLXY
+3.8%
+103.2%
-28.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLXY | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.6% | +1.1% | +4.5% | +5.4% |
| 7D | +3.0% | -7.3% | +10.3% | +4.6% |
| 30D | -5.2% | +15.7% | -20.9% | -8.4% |
| 3M | +27.6% | -26.7% | +54.3% | +33.5% |
| 6M | +44.4% | +13.7% | +30.7% | +35.6% |
| YTD | +52.3% | +9.1% | +43.2% | +40.8% |
| 1Y | +30.4% | -15.5% | +45.9% | +24.5% |
| All | +107.0% | +3.8% | +103.2% | +83.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLXY.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLXY return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLXY return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLXY wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling