+96.0%
ANET vs GLXY
+2.7%
+93.3%
-28.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLXY | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.0% | -4.1% | +2.0% | -1.2% |
| 7D | -1.3% | -8.9% | +7.7% | +0.6% |
| 30D | -4.5% | +19.9% | -24.3% | -8.4% |
| 3M | +24.5% | -20.0% | +44.5% | +28.0% |
| 6M | +35.4% | +10.5% | +24.8% | +27.9% |
| YTD | +44.2% | +7.9% | +36.3% | +33.6% |
| 1Y | +25.4% | -7.5% | +32.9% | +18.1% |
| All | +96.0% | +2.7% | +93.3% | +74.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLXY.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLXY return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLXY return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLXY wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling