+38.3%
ZM vs DECK
-3.0%
+41.3%
-25.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | DECK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.3% | +1.6% | +1.7% | +3.0% |
| 7D | +2.9% | -2.2% | +5.2% | +3.3% |
| 30D | +0.7% | -13.6% | +14.3% | +2.6% |
| 3M | -3.7% | -21.2% | +17.6% | -0.8% |
| 6M | +29.9% | -21.1% | +51.0% | +33.3% |
| YTD | +17.4% | -17.2% | +34.7% | +19.3% |
| 1Y | +22.4% | -30.7% | +53.1% | +27.3% |
| All | +38.3% | -3.0% | +41.3% | +37.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside DECK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus DECK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × DECK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded DECK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling