+9.3%
ZM vs DECK
+6.6%
+2.7%
-25.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | DECK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.2% | -1.2% | +2.4% | +1.3% |
| 7D | -5.9% | +5.8% | -11.6% | -6.3% |
| 30D | -5.2% | +7.9% | -13.0% | -5.7% |
| 3M | -11.3% | -11.4% | +0.1% | -11.0% |
| 6M | -14.5% | -16.6% | +2.1% | -14.2% |
| YTD | +4.2% | -16.4% | +20.5% | +5.6% |
| 1Y | +9.3% | +8.6% | +0.7% | +1.1% |
| All | +9.3% | +6.6% | +2.7% | +1.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside DECK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus DECK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × DECK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded DECK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling