+122.4%
ZETA vs GLXY
-41.9%
+164.3%
-40.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLXY | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.3% | +5.2% | +0.1% | +4.4% |
| 7D | -0.4% | -14.6% | +14.2% | +1.5% |
| 30D | -8.0% | -36.2% | +28.1% | -2.1% |
| 3M | +21.4% | -30.1% | +51.5% | +26.3% |
| 6M | +80.1% | -56.1% | +136.2% | +100.3% |
| YTD | +52.5% | -38.9% | +91.4% | +48.5% |
| 1Y | +58.5% | -55.0% | +113.5% | +66.7% |
| All | +122.4% | -41.9% | +164.3% | +127.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLXY.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLXY return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLXY return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLXY wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling