+65.8%
ZETA vs GLXY
+13.9%
+51.9%
-40.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLXY | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.8% | +2.7% | -4.5% | -2.3% |
| 7D | -2.4% | +15.5% | -17.9% | -4.9% |
| 30D | +15.6% | +34.1% | -18.5% | +9.2% |
| 3M | +41.5% | -11.3% | +52.8% | +44.0% |
| 6M | +63.4% | +31.6% | +31.8% | +44.5% |
| YTD | +51.3% | +21.0% | +30.3% | +28.7% |
| 1Y | +65.8% | +11.7% | +54.1% | +50.0% |
| All | +65.8% | +13.9% | +51.9% | +50.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLXY.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLXY return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLXY return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLXY wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling