+63.0%
ZETA vs GLXY
-55.4%
+118.4%
-40.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLXY | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.5% | +6.2% | -1.7% | +3.6% |
| 7D | +6.2% | -0.5% | +6.8% | +5.7% |
| 30D | -2.0% | -28.6% | +26.6% | +1.6% |
| 3M | +21.7% | -28.1% | +49.8% | +25.2% |
| 6M | +89.1% | -52.0% | +141.1% | +105.2% |
| YTD | +59.3% | -35.1% | +94.4% | +47.5% |
| All | +63.0% | -55.4% | +118.4% | +68.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLXY.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLXY return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLXY return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLXY wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling