+67.1%
ZETA vs GLDM
-14.2%
+81.3%
-29.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.1% | -0.9% | -3.2% | -3.6% |
| 7D | +2.7% | -0.5% | +3.2% | +2.9% |
| 30D | +15.8% | +4.4% | +11.4% | +13.0% |
| 3M | +35.4% | -1.1% | +36.5% | +33.8% |
| 6M | +67.1% | -13.7% | +80.8% | +66.5% |
| All | +67.1% | -14.2% | +81.3% | +66.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling