+58.5%
ZETA vs GLDM
+1.8%
+56.7%
-40.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.3% | -0.8% | +6.1% | +5.6% |
| 7D | -0.4% | +4.7% | -5.1% | -2.1% |
| 30D | -8.0% | -0.9% | -7.2% | -7.8% |
| 3M | +21.4% | -4.3% | +25.7% | +22.8% |
| 6M | +80.1% | -13.4% | +93.5% | +86.6% |
| YTD | +52.5% | -5.8% | +58.3% | +35.8% |
| 1Y | +58.5% | +2.1% | +56.4% | +25.3% |
| All | +58.5% | +1.8% | +56.7% | +25.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling