+67.8%
ZETA vs GLDM
+24.7%
+43.1%
-40.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.1% | -0.9% | -3.2% | -3.8% |
| 7D | +2.7% | -0.5% | +3.2% | +2.8% |
| 30D | +15.8% | +4.4% | +11.4% | +14.0% |
| 3M | +35.4% | -1.1% | +36.5% | +34.9% |
| 6M | +67.1% | -13.7% | +80.8% | +71.9% |
| YTD | +54.1% | +2.8% | +51.3% | +47.8% |
| 1Y | +67.8% | +24.8% | +43.0% | +45.5% |
| All | +67.8% | +24.7% | +43.1% | +45.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling