+72.2%
ZETA vs DECK
-10.6%
+82.7%
-29.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | DECK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.6% | +6.0% | -3.4% | +0.7% |
| 7D | -5.0% | +10.4% | -15.4% | -8.0% |
| 30D | -3.3% | +11.1% | -14.4% | -6.7% |
| 3M | +31.0% | -10.8% | +41.8% | +36.5% |
| 6M | +72.2% | -8.7% | +80.9% | +87.5% |
| All | +72.2% | -10.6% | +82.7% | +87.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside DECK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus DECK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × DECK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded DECK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling