+262.5%
ZETA vs DECK
-12.4%
+274.8%
-70.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | DECK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -7.3% | -1.5% | -5.7% | -6.7% |
| 7D | -10.0% | +6.0% | -16.0% | -11.8% |
| 30D | -10.6% | +7.4% | -18.0% | -12.9% |
| 3M | +8.9% | -11.7% | +20.5% | +13.2% |
| 6M | +65.1% | -11.0% | +76.1% | +70.5% |
| YTD | +44.8% | -15.4% | +60.2% | +50.1% |
| 1Y | +47.8% | +7.2% | +40.5% | +39.6% |
| All | +262.5% | -12.4% | +274.8% | +224.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside DECK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus DECK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × DECK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded DECK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling