-99.9%
ZCMD vs FIGR
+5.9%
-105.8%
-99.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | FIGR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.0% | -0.4% | +4.4% | +4.0% |
| 7D | -4.1% | +14.9% | -19.0% | -4.9% |
| 30D | -22.7% | +32.3% | -55.0% | -24.7% |
| 3M | -62.5% | +34.8% | -97.3% | -63.7% |
| 6M | -99.5% | +16.8% | -116.2% | -99.5% |
| YTD | -99.7% | -6.7% | -93.1% | -99.7% |
| All | -99.9% | +5.9% | -105.8% | -99.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FIGR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FIGR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FIGR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FIGR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling