-99.9%
ZCMD vs FIGR
-3.1%
-96.8%
-99.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | FIGR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -7.1% | -4.6% | -2.4% | -6.8% |
| 7D | -5.4% | -3.0% | -2.4% | -5.3% |
| 30D | -24.8% | +13.7% | -38.4% | -26.0% |
| 3M | -62.8% | +23.9% | -86.7% | -63.8% |
| 6M | -99.5% | -8.4% | -91.1% | -99.5% |
| YTD | -99.8% | -14.6% | -85.1% | -99.8% |
| 1Y | -99.9% | +12.1% | -112.0% | -99.9% |
| All | -99.9% | -3.1% | -96.8% | -99.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FIGR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FIGR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FIGR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FIGR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling