-99.9%
ZCMD vs FIGR
-0.1%
-99.8%
-99.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | FIGR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.8% | -0.7% | -3.1% | -3.7% |
| 7D | -8.0% | -0.2% | -7.8% | -8.0% |
| 30D | -27.9% | +25.2% | -53.1% | -29.5% |
| 3M | -74.6% | +14.8% | -89.4% | -75.0% |
| 6M | -99.5% | +17.9% | -117.4% | -99.5% |
| YTD | -99.7% | -11.9% | -87.8% | -99.7% |
| All | -99.9% | -0.1% | -99.8% | -99.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FIGR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FIGR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FIGR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FIGR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling