+10.0%
WULF vs NCLH
-27.1%
+37.1%
-49.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | NCLH | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.7% | +1.7% | +2.0% | +2.9% |
| 7D | +1.4% | -4.8% | +6.2% | +3.7% |
| 30D | -2.6% | -21.7% | +19.1% | +8.1% |
| 3M | -34.0% | -22.2% | -11.7% | -28.9% |
| 6M | +10.0% | -27.5% | +37.5% | +25.7% |
| All | +10.0% | -27.1% | +37.1% | +25.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NCLH.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NCLH return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NCLH return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NCLH wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling