-32.3%
WULF vs NCLH
-21.2%
-11.1%
-49.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3mo.
| Period | Portfolio | NCLH | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.1% | -3.5% | -0.6% | -3.9% |
| 7D | +15.6% | -4.6% | +20.2% | +15.9% |
| 30D | +5.7% | -19.9% | +25.7% | +6.8% |
| 3M | -32.3% | -22.0% | -10.3% | -35.3% |
| All | -32.3% | -21.2% | -11.1% | -35.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NCLH.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NCLH return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NCLH return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NCLH wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · Available span rolling