+39.1%
TMUS vs TRGP
+263.5%
-224.4%
-37.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | TRGP | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.5% | -1.2% | -2.3% | -3.3% |
| 7D | +0.1% | +0.8% | -0.7% | 0.0% |
| 30D | +5.3% | +11.5% | -6.3% | +4.1% |
| 3M | +3.1% | +9.0% | -5.9% | +2.1% |
| 6M | -16.5% | +20.5% | -37.0% | -18.1% |
| YTD | -9.2% | +59.5% | -68.7% | -13.3% |
| 1Y | -26.5% | +77.9% | -104.4% | -30.7% |
| All | +39.1% | +263.5% | -224.4% | +26.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TRGP.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TRGP return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TRGP return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TRGP wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling