+68.5%
TGT vs GLDM
+99.6%
-31.1%
-49.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.1% | -2.8% | +1.7% | -1.1% |
| 7D | +2.6% | -5.5% | +8.1% | +2.7% |
| 30D | +6.6% | -7.0% | +13.6% | +6.6% |
| 3M | +5.2% | -12.3% | +17.5% | +5.2% |
| 6M | +35.3% | -17.9% | +53.2% | +35.5% |
| YTD | +70.3% | -10.3% | +80.6% | +68.2% |
| 1Y | +81.2% | -7.8% | +88.9% | +78.8% |
| All | +68.5% | +99.6% | -31.1% | +32.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling