+84.9%
TGT vs GLDM
+1.8%
+83.1%
-12.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.3% | -0.8% | +1.1% | +0.3% |
| 7D | +2.6% | +4.7% | -2.0% | +2.6% |
| 30D | +5.0% | -0.9% | +5.8% | +4.8% |
| 3M | +8.5% | -4.3% | +12.8% | +8.6% |
| 6M | +23.8% | -13.4% | +37.2% | +23.6% |
| YTD | +66.5% | -5.8% | +72.3% | +59.9% |
| 1Y | +84.9% | +2.1% | +82.8% | +75.9% |
| All | +84.9% | +1.8% | +83.1% | +75.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling