+60.5%
TEM vs NIO
-12.8%
+73.4%
-59.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.1% | -1.6% | +1.5% | +0.3% |
| 7D | +0.9% | -13.0% | +13.9% | +4.3% |
| 30D | +38.4% | -18.3% | +56.7% | +45.5% |
| 3M | +23.7% | -33.2% | +56.9% | +36.0% |
| 6M | +26.0% | -21.5% | +47.5% | +31.7% |
| YTD | +9.4% | -25.5% | +34.9% | +15.4% |
| 1Y | -17.3% | -38.0% | +20.7% | -9.1% |
| All | +60.5% | -12.8% | +73.4% | +44.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling