+77.9%
TEM vs NIO
-33.5%
+111.4%
-59.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -5.7% | -4.9% | -0.7% | -4.4% |
| 7D | -5.9% | -14.5% | +8.6% | -1.9% |
| 30D | +4.8% | -15.0% | +19.8% | +9.5% |
| 3M | +31.9% | -35.6% | +67.4% | +47.3% |
| 6M | +56.0% | -55.7% | +111.6% | +89.1% |
| YTD | +21.3% | -43.1% | +64.4% | +37.0% |
| 1Y | +5.4% | -53.5% | +58.9% | +24.7% |
| All | +77.9% | -33.5% | +111.4% | +71.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling