+93.0%
SN vs ALHC
-60.0%
+153.0%
-16.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | ALHC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.7% | -2.9% | +5.6% | +2.9% |
| 7D | +7.2% | +1.0% | +6.2% | +7.1% |
| 30D | +20.4% | -14.2% | +34.5% | +21.6% |
| 3M | +23.9% | -45.1% | +69.1% | +30.3% |
| 6M | +93.0% | -59.5% | +152.6% | +100.4% |
| All | +93.0% | -60.0% | +153.0% | +100.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ALHC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ALHC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ALHC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ALHC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling