+438.7%
SN vs ALHC
+16.3%
+422.3%
-42.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ALHC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.9% | -1.0% | +3.9% | +3.0% |
| 7D | +7.6% | +3.9% | +3.8% | +7.5% |
| 30D | +24.1% | -3.6% | +27.7% | +24.1% |
| 3M | +23.7% | -49.4% | +73.1% | +25.5% |
| 6M | +105.5% | -59.5% | +165.0% | +108.8% |
| YTD | +105.1% | -63.2% | +168.3% | +108.4% |
| 1Y | +148.3% | -55.5% | +203.8% | +153.0% |
| 3Y | +438.7% | +23.0% | +415.7% | +448.9% |
| All | +438.7% | +16.3% | +422.3% | +448.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ALHC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ALHC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ALHC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ALHC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling