+75.9%
SCHW vs UMAC
+488.3%
-412.3%
-21.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.7% | -3.2% | +4.0% | +0.8% |
| 7D | -2.8% | -4.0% | +1.2% | -2.7% |
| 30D | -0.1% | -9.4% | +9.3% | 0.0% |
| 3M | +20.6% | +3.0% | +17.6% | +20.2% |
| 6M | +15.9% | +27.2% | -11.2% | +14.3% |
| YTD | +8.5% | +84.7% | -76.2% | +5.9% |
| 1Y | +17.8% | +136.5% | -118.6% | +14.2% |
| All | +75.9% | +488.3% | -412.3% | +69.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling