+15.9%
SCHW vs UMAC
+35.9%
-19.9%
-14.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.7% | -3.2% | +4.0% | +0.7% |
| 7D | -2.8% | -4.0% | +1.2% | -2.8% |
| 30D | -0.1% | -9.4% | +9.3% | 0.0% |
| 3M | +20.6% | +3.0% | +17.6% | +21.0% |
| 6M | +15.9% | +27.2% | -11.2% | +18.4% |
| All | +15.9% | +35.9% | -19.9% | +18.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling