+687.6%
RGTI vs GLDM
+130.1%
+557.4%
-77.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.1% | -0.9% | +1.0% | +0.7% |
| 7D | -2.5% | -0.5% | -2.0% | -2.1% |
| 30D | -9.4% | +4.4% | -13.8% | -11.7% |
| 3M | -37.1% | -1.1% | -36.0% | -36.5% |
| 6M | -14.4% | -13.7% | -0.7% | -7.4% |
| YTD | -31.4% | +2.8% | -34.1% | -29.0% |
| 1Y | +0.5% | +24.8% | -24.3% | 0.0% |
| All | +687.6% | +130.1% | +557.4% | +467.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling