-64.6%
RGTI vs GLDM
-3.6%
-61.0%
-68.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -8.6% | -1.2% | -7.4% | -7.4% |
| 7D | -0.9% | -2.0% | +1.1% | +1.2% |
| 30D | -16.2% | -4.4% | -11.7% | -11.8% |
| 3M | -38.6% | -8.8% | -29.7% | -32.3% |
| 6M | -45.8% | -15.9% | -29.9% | -35.7% |
| YTD | -49.8% | -7.7% | -42.2% | -43.4% |
| 1Y | -64.6% | -3.6% | -61.0% | -63.0% |
| All | -64.6% | -3.6% | -61.0% | -63.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling