+206.2%
RDDT vs PLD
+14.8%
+191.5%
-61.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | PLD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.0% | -0.7% | -0.3% | -0.7% |
| 7D | +1.0% | -2.4% | +3.3% | +1.9% |
| 30D | -0.5% | -2.4% | +1.9% | +0.5% |
| 3M | -16.0% | -3.8% | -12.2% | -14.7% |
| 6M | +4.9% | 0.0% | +4.8% | +4.1% |
| YTD | -32.8% | +9.2% | -42.0% | -36.1% |
| 1Y | -33.5% | +25.9% | -59.4% | -41.3% |
| All | +206.2% | +14.8% | +191.5% | +134.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PLD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PLD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PLD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PLD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling