+190.3%
RDDT vs PLD
+13.4%
+177.0%
-61.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | PLD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.0% | -2.0% | +0.1% | -1.1% |
| 7D | -7.4% | -0.7% | -6.7% | -7.1% |
| 30D | -7.7% | -2.2% | -5.5% | -7.0% |
| 3M | -17.8% | -7.4% | -10.4% | -15.2% |
| 6M | +5.5% | +1.9% | +3.5% | +3.7% |
| YTD | -36.3% | +7.9% | -44.2% | -39.1% |
| 1Y | -39.0% | +25.1% | -64.1% | -46.1% |
| All | +190.3% | +13.4% | +177.0% | +123.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PLD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PLD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PLD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PLD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling