+95.2%
RDDT vs PLD
+8.4%
+86.8%
-66.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | PLD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.1% | +0.1% | -1.2% | -1.1% |
| 7D | +3.5% | +1.3% | +2.2% | +3.0% |
| 30D | -33.7% | -1.4% | -32.4% | -33.4% |
| 3M | -37.7% | -8.2% | -29.6% | -35.6% |
| 6M | -36.1% | -8.0% | -28.1% | -34.1% |
| YTD | -57.2% | +3.2% | -60.3% | -58.3% |
| 1Y | -48.0% | +7.0% | -55.0% | -50.3% |
| All | +95.2% | +8.4% | +86.8% | +52.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PLD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PLD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PLD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PLD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling