+196.2%
RDDT vs NIO
-25.1%
+221.3%
-61.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.3% | -0.3% | -3.0% | -3.2% |
| 7D | +3.3% | -6.7% | +9.9% | +4.6% |
| 30D | -7.6% | -20.0% | +12.4% | -3.6% |
| 3M | -12.7% | -30.5% | +17.7% | -6.5% |
| 6M | +7.2% | -20.7% | +27.9% | +10.8% |
| YTD | -35.0% | -25.7% | -9.3% | -32.3% |
| 1Y | -35.0% | -38.6% | +3.5% | -30.3% |
| All | +196.2% | -25.1% | +221.3% | +161.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling