+212.8%
RDDT vs NIO
-27.1%
+239.9%
-61.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 10y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.6% | +3.1% | -1.5% | +1.0% |
| 7D | +2.1% | -2.9% | +5.0% | +2.7% |
| 30D | +2.8% | -18.7% | +21.5% | +6.9% |
| 3M | -8.9% | -29.4% | +20.5% | -2.7% |
| 6M | +15.1% | -32.5% | +47.6% | +23.1% |
| YTD | -31.4% | -27.6% | -3.7% | -28.1% |
| 1Y | -39.4% | -39.2% | -0.2% | -34.8% |
| All | +212.8% | -27.1% | +239.9% | +177.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 10y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
10y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling