+206.2%
RDDT vs LSCC
+45.0%
+161.2%
-61.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | LSCC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.0% | +2.0% | -3.0% | -1.6% |
| 7D | +1.0% | +1.3% | -0.4% | +0.6% |
| 30D | -0.5% | -9.7% | +9.2% | +2.5% |
| 3M | -16.0% | -23.7% | +7.7% | -10.1% |
| 6M | +4.9% | +26.5% | -21.6% | -6.8% |
| YTD | -32.8% | +57.5% | -90.3% | -46.0% |
| 1Y | -33.5% | +75.7% | -109.1% | -49.1% |
| All | +206.2% | +45.0% | +161.2% | +100.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LSCC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LSCC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LSCC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LSCC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling