+190.3%
RDDT vs LSCC
+44.4%
+145.9%
-61.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | LSCC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.0% | -1.7% | -0.2% | -1.4% |
| 7D | -7.4% | +1.4% | -8.8% | -7.8% |
| 30D | -7.7% | -10.0% | +2.3% | -4.8% |
| 3M | -17.8% | -16.1% | -1.7% | -14.4% |
| 6M | +5.5% | +27.4% | -21.9% | -6.5% |
| YTD | -36.3% | +56.9% | -93.2% | -48.7% |
| 1Y | -39.0% | +74.6% | -113.6% | -53.3% |
| All | +190.3% | +44.4% | +145.9% | +90.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LSCC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LSCC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LSCC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LSCC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling