+206.2%
RDDT vs HTZ
-69.5%
+275.8%
-61.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | HTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.0% | +1.3% | -2.3% | -1.1% |
| 7D | +1.0% | +7.5% | -6.5% | +0.5% |
| 30D | -0.5% | +47.4% | -48.0% | -3.9% |
| 3M | -16.0% | -54.9% | +38.9% | -12.4% |
| 6M | +4.9% | -47.0% | +51.9% | +7.6% |
| YTD | -32.8% | -55.3% | +22.4% | -30.4% |
| 1Y | -33.5% | -57.6% | +24.2% | -31.4% |
| All | +206.2% | -69.5% | +275.8% | +276.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling