+95.6%
RDDT vs HTZ
-80.1%
+175.8%
-66.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | HTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.1% | -8.0% | +5.9% | -1.5% |
| 7D | +2.6% | -27.5% | +30.2% | +5.1% |
| 30D | -38.3% | -21.9% | -16.4% | -37.1% |
| 3M | -37.8% | -29.2% | -8.6% | -36.6% |
| 6M | -36.7% | -75.2% | +38.5% | -31.1% |
| YTD | -57.1% | -70.8% | +13.7% | -54.2% |
| 1Y | -51.7% | -76.1% | +24.4% | -47.8% |
| All | +95.6% | -80.1% | +175.8% | +147.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling