+196.2%
RDDT vs HTZ
-71.1%
+267.2%
-61.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | HTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.3% | -5.0% | +1.7% | -3.0% |
| 7D | +3.3% | -2.5% | +5.7% | +3.5% |
| 30D | -7.6% | -3.7% | -3.9% | -7.8% |
| 3M | -12.7% | -57.0% | +44.3% | -8.6% |
| 6M | +7.2% | -47.0% | +54.1% | +9.9% |
| YTD | -35.0% | -57.5% | +22.5% | -32.5% |
| 1Y | -35.0% | -63.5% | +28.4% | -32.1% |
| All | +196.2% | -71.1% | +267.2% | +265.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling