+131.0%
RCL vs NIO
-36.7%
+167.6%
-83.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.1% | -1.6% | +1.4% | +0.1% |
| 7D | -5.1% | -13.0% | +8.0% | -3.1% |
| 30D | -19.0% | -18.3% | -0.7% | -16.6% |
| 3M | -9.6% | -33.2% | +23.6% | -4.1% |
| 6M | -6.7% | -21.5% | +14.8% | -4.1% |
| YTD | -3.9% | -25.5% | +21.6% | -0.7% |
| 1Y | -25.1% | -38.0% | +12.9% | -21.2% |
| 3Y | +179.1% | -65.5% | +244.6% | +201.5% |
| 5Y | +243.3% | -90.6% | +333.9% | +320.9% |
| All | +131.0% | -36.7% | +167.6% | +89.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling