+23.6%
RCL vs NIO
-47.2%
+70.8%
-29.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.1% | -3.0% | -0.1% | -2.7% |
| 7D | +3.9% | -3.6% | +7.5% | +4.4% |
| 30D | +11.8% | -8.0% | +19.8% | +12.8% |
| 3M | -0.8% | -31.2% | +30.3% | +3.7% |
| 6M | +23.6% | -45.8% | +69.4% | +35.3% |
| All | +23.6% | -47.2% | +70.8% | +35.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling