-25.1%
RCL vs NIO
-37.4%
+12.3%
-31.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.1% | -1.6% | +1.4% | 0.0% |
| 7D | -5.1% | -13.0% | +8.0% | -3.8% |
| 30D | -19.0% | -18.3% | -0.7% | -17.5% |
| 3M | -9.6% | -33.2% | +23.6% | -6.1% |
| 6M | -6.7% | -21.5% | +14.8% | -4.2% |
| YTD | -3.9% | -25.5% | +21.6% | -1.9% |
| 1Y | -25.1% | -38.0% | +12.9% | -24.2% |
| All | -25.1% | -37.4% | +12.3% | -24.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling